Organizational learning in exploration and explotation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33975/riuq.vol35nS1.821Keywords:
learning, organization, ambidexterity, exploration, exploitation, cultureAbstract
This review article addresses the aspects inherent to the characteristics of organizational learning and exploitation and exploration, namely, its background, phases and types of learning. Likewise we will relate according to literature studies how organizations have the capacity to develop at the same time innovations that exploit their current learning and at the same time explore new opportunities that go beyond the present learning, where we determine it as organizational ambidexterity. Thus, it is concluded that organizational learning relates the learning of exploitation and exploration.
Downloads
References
Adler, P., Goldoftas, B., & Levine, D. (1999). Flexibility Versus Efficiency? A Case Study of Model Changeovers in the Toyota Production System. Organization Science, 10(1), 43–68.
Argyris, C., y Scho¨n, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. AddisonWesley.
Argyris, C., y Scho¨n, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: A theory of action perspective. AddisonWesley.
Argyris, C. (1999). Tacit knowledge and management. En: Sternberg R. J. y J. A. Horvath, Tacit knowledge in professional practice: Researcher and practitioner perspectives (pp. 123–140). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Alcid, J. y Lugo, D. (2008). Estado del arte del aprendizaje organizacional con relación al aprendizaje individual y la cultura [Tesis de licenciatura, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana].
Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005). Resolving the capability–rigidity paradox in new product innovation. Journal of marketing, 69(4), 61-83.
Bener, M. y Tushman, M. (2003). Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited. The Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238-256
Bierly III, P. E., & Daly, P. S. (2007). Alternative knowledge strategies, competitive environment, and organizational performance in small manufacturing firms. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 31(4), 493-516.
Bontis, N., Crossan, M. M., y Hulland, J. (2002). Managing an organizational learning system by aligning stocks and flows. Journal of management studies, 39(4), 437-469
Brown, J. y Duguid, P. (1992). Enacting design for the workplace. In P. Adler & T. Winograd (Eds.), Usability:Turning technologies into tools (pp. 164-198). New York: Oxford University Press.
Cho, H. J. y Pucik, V. (2005). Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value. Strategic management journal, 26(6), 555-575.
Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W. White, R. E. y Djurfeldt, L. (1995). Organizational learning: Dimensions for a theory. International Journal for Organizational Analysis, 3, 337-360.
Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W. y White, R. E. (1999): An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522-537.
Daft, R. L. y Weick, K. E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of management review, 9(2), 284-295.
Dixon. (1994). The organizational learning cycle: How we can learn collectively. McGraw Hill, Maidenhead, Berkshire, UK.
Dodgson, M. (1993). Organizational learning: A review of some literatures. Organization Studies, 14(3), 375-394.
Eisenhardt, K. M. y Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they?. Strategic management journal, 21(10‐11), 1105-1121.
Gil Marquéz, M. (2009). El equilibrio dinámico exploración-explotación en el marco de la gestión de la calidad total y su impacto sobre la innovación: análisis del ambidiestrismo en sectores tradicionales valencianos. Universidad de Valencia, Departamento de Dirección de Empresas Juan José Renau Piqueras.
Geiger, S. W., & Makri, M. (2006). Exploration and exploitation innovation processes: The role of organizational slack in R & D intensive firms. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 17(1), 97-108. doi:DOI:10.1016/j.hitech.2006.05.007
Gil, AJ, Carrrillo, FJ, & Fonseca-Pedrero, E. (2019). Evaluación de un modelo de organización de aprendizaje: la perspectiva de un maestro. Gestión en Educación , 33 (1), 21–31
Gilberto López Orozco, María Dolores Gil Montelongo, Carlos Arturo Bolio-Yris 2017. Aprendizaje organizacional, caso una panificadora. Ingeniería Industrial/ISSN 1815-5936/Vol. XXXVIII/No. 2/mayo-agosto/2017/p. 161-170
G. R. Fuentes, F. Vallaeys y M. A. Garzón, «El aprendizaje organizacional como herramienta para la universidad que aprende a ser responsable socialmente,» Revista Pensamiento Americano, vol. 11, nº 20, 2018.
He, Z. L. y Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization science, 15(4), 481-494.
Huber, G.P. (1991). Organizacional learning. The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2, 88-115.
Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A. y Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management science, 52(11), 1661-1674.
Katila, R. y Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of management journal, 45(6), 1183-1194.
Kofman, F. y Senge, P. M. (1993). Communities of commitment: The heart of learning organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 22(2), 5–23.
Koryak, O., Lockett, A., Hayton, J., Nicolaou, N. y Mole, K. (2018). Disentangling the antecedents of ambidexterity: Exploration and exploitation. Research Policy, 47(2), 413-427.
Lewin, A. Y., Long, C. P., & Caroll, T. N. (1999). The coevolution of new organizational forms. Organization Science, 10 (5): 535-550. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.5.535
Li, Y., Vanhaverbeke, W. y Schoenmakers, W. (2008). Exploration and exploitation in innovation: Reframing the interpretation. Creativity and innovation management, 17(2), 107-126.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization science, 5(1), 14-37.
Nonaka, I. y Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford university press
March, J. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
Marín-Idárraga, D. A. Ambidestreza organizacional, innovación y desempeño: Un estudio empírico en pymes bogotanas. GESTIÓN ORGANIZACIONAL, 13.
Moreno, Balbastre, Escriva, Lloria, Martínez, Mendez, Oltra, Peris (2001). La generación de conocimiento en la organización: Propuesta de un modelo integrador de los distintos niveles ontológicos de aprendizaje. Universidad de Valencia.
McGill, M. E., Slocum Jr, J. W., y Lei, D. (1992). Management practices in learning organizations. Organizational dynamics, 21(1), 5-17.
Opengart, R (2015) Gestión de la cadena de suministro y organización de aprendizaje: una fusión de literaturas. Revista Internacional de Comercio y Gestión 25(2): 183 – 195.
Ponti, J. O. (1997). Cómo formar aprovechando las capacidades internas. Alta dirección, 31(191), 65-73.
Rosenkopf, L. y Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic management journal, 22(4), 287-306.
R. M. Valencia, «Capacidades dinámicas, innovación de producto de aprendizaje organizacional en pymes del sector cárnico,» Ingeniería industrial, vol. 36, nº 3, pp. 287-305, 2015.
R. A. Jiménez, P. C. Campos, J. Vargas-Hernandez, R. C. Cárdenas y F. P. Salceda, «Aprendizaje y desempeño organizacional bajo el enfoque de las teorías organizacionales,» REVISTA DE ECONOMÍA Y ADMINISTRACIÓN, vol. 13 , nº 1, pp. 83-94, 2016.
Santa, M, Nurcan, S (2016) Patrones de modelado de organizaciones de aprendizaje. Investigación y práctica de la gestión del conocimiento 14(1): 106 – 125
Serrat Olivier (2016), Knowledge Solutions, Tools, Methods, and Approaches to Drive Organizational Performance.
https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-981-10-0983-9
Siren, C. A., Kohtamäki, M., & Kuckertz, A. (2012). Exploration and exploitation strategies, profit performance, and the mediating role of strategic learning: Escaping the exploitation trap. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6(1), 18-41.
Sicilia, MA, Lystras, MD ( 2005 ) La organización del aprendizaje semántico . La Organización de Aprendizaje 12(5): 402 – 410 .
S. M. Carrillo-Sierra, J. Forgiony-Santos, D. Rivera-Porras, N. J. Bonilla-Cruz, M. L. Montánchez-Torres y M. Alarcón-Carvajal, «Prácticas pedagógicas frente a la educación inclusiva desde la perspectiva del docente,» Revista Espacios, vol. 39, nº 17, pp. 15-32, 2018
Sharma, R. R., Nguyen, T. K., & Crick, D. (2018). Exploitation strategy and performance of contract manufacturing exporters: The mediating roles of exploration strategy and marketing capability. Journal of International Management, 24(3), 271-283.Schein, E. (1992). Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Tushman, M. L. y O'Reilly III, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California management review, 38(4), 8-29.
Williams, M. (2001). A belief-focused process model of organizational learning. Journal of Management Studies, 38(1), 67-85.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista de Investigaciones Universidad del Quindío
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
