La base psicolingüística de la conceptualización lingüística
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33975/riuq.vol34n2.913Palabras clave:
Conceptos, psicolingüística, memoria a corto plazo, memoria a largo plazo, conceptualizaciónResumen
El objeto de este artículo es la metodología de la psicolingüística en relación con el análisis de conceptos. La relevancia del artículo se debe a la necesidad de aplicar nuevos enfoques al análisis de los fenómenos lingüísticos, para los cuales una metodología puramente lingüística no es suficiente. El método de compilación, un método comparativo y un método de modelado lingüístico se utilizan para cumplir con el objetivo del estudio. El autor describe en detalle los vacíos de investigación que existen en este momento en psicolingüística, en particular, la estructura de la relación entre la memoria sensorial, a corto y largo plazo aún no está completamente definida, y por lo tanto la base para un análisis profundo de la conceptualización no es del todo clara. El autor concluye que la metodología psicolingüística tiene el mayor poder explicativo sobre el proceso cognitivo de conceptualización. Al mismo tiempo, en el caso del análisis comparativo de varias culturas lingüísticas, se actualiza la necesidad de un uso adicional del aparato conceptual y metodológico de los estudios culturales y la etnología.
Descargas
Citas
Spence and J. T. Spence (Eds.) Thepsycho- logy of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, Vol. II. New York: Academic Press, 89-195.
Babushkin, A. P. (2006). Types of concepts in lexical and phraseological semantics of language, their personal and national specifics. Voronezh, 330-342.
Badrutdinova L. A., & Ziatdinova G. I. (2014). To the question of national language picture of the world. Science time. 12, 24-26.
Balganova, E. (2021). Digitalization Trends and Risks Professional Education. Russian Journal of Education and Psychology, 12(3), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-4034-2021-12-3-19-31
Barsalou, L. W. (2016). Situated conceptualization: Theory and application. Y. Coello, M. H. Fischer, Foundations of embodied cognition. East Sussex: Psychology Press, 11-37.
Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. New York: Pergamon Press, 352-365.
Borovkova, E. (2021). Structural-Semantic and Linguistic-Stylistic Features of O. Wilde’s Maxims. Modern Studies of Social Issues, 13(2), 55-70. https://doi.org/10.12731/2077-1770-2021-13-2-55-70
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of Processing: A Framework for Memory Research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
Evans-Amalu, K., & Claravall, E. (2021). Inclusive Online Teaching and Digital Learning: Lessons Learned in the Time of Pandemic and Beyond. Journal of Curriculum Studies Research, 3(1), i-iii. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcsr.2021.4
Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2014). Conceptual composition: The role of relational competition in the comprehension of modifi er-noun phrases and noun-noun compounds. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 59, 97-130.
Garrone-Shufran, S. (2021). Preparing secondary teacher candidates to teach academic English. Journal Of Curriculum Studies Research, 3(2), 100-121. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcsr.2021.1
Gelyaeva, A. I. (2002). Man in the linguistic picture of the world; Nalchik: Kabardino-Balkarian State University named after H.M. Berbekov, 148-177 .
Glushkova, T. S., & Zaitseva O. A. (2017). Media image as a tool for creating a territorial image: cognitive aspect. Science of man: Humanitarian studies. 3(29), 50-57.
Hampton, J. A., & Jönsson, M. (2012). Typicality and compositionality: The logic of combining vague concepts. M. Werning, W. Hinzen, & E. Machery (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compositionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 385-482.
Isaikina, M., Nedogreeva, N., & Pokotilo, A. (2021). Role of Metasubject Educational Results in Learners’ Professional Self-Consciousness Formation. Russian Journal of Education and Psychology, 12(3), 7-18. https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-4034-2021-12-3-7-18
Karasik, V. I. (2001). On the categories of linguoculturology. Linguistic personality: problems of communicative activity. Volgograd, 3-16.
Kolesov, V. V. (2002). Philosophy of the Russian word. St. Petersburg, 2002, 448 p.
Kim, D., Coenraad, M., & Park, H. R. (2021). Digital storytelling as a tool for reflection in virtual reality projects. Journal of Curriculum Studies Research, 3(1), 101-121. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcsr.2021.9
Kudinovа, G. F., Kudinov, I. V., Aitova, V. M., Evgrafova, O. G., & Zimovets, L. G. (2018). On psychosemantics of notions "opinion", "knowledge", "belief". International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology* (IJMET) 9, 1010–1020.
Kulikova, T. (2021). Interconnection of Time Competence and Stress Resistance of Teachers with Different Work Experience. Russian Journal of Education and Psychology, 12(3), 86-105. https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-4034-2021-12-3-86-105
Minsky, M. (1979). Frames for the representation of knowledge. M.: Energiya. 151 p.
Murdock, B. B. R. (1972). Short-term memory. G. H. Bower (Ed.) Psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 5. New York: Academic Press, 67-27.
Norman, D. A. (1969). Memory while shadowing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, 85-93.
Otts, E. V., Panova, E. P., Lobanova, Y. V., Bocharnikova, N. V., Panfilova, V. M., & Panfilov, A. N. (2021). Modification of the role of a teacher under the conditions of distance learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(21), 219-225. https://doi:10.3991/ijet.v16i21.25675
Panova, E. P., Tjumentseva, E. V., Koroleva, I. A., Ibragimova, E. R., & Samusenkov, V. O. (2021). Organization of project work with the help of digital technologies in teaching russian as a foreign language at the initial stage. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(22), 208-220. https://doi:10.3991/ijet.v16i22.20573
Peterson L. R. (1966). Short-term verbal memory and learning. Psychological Review, 73, 193-207.
Pogosyan, V. (2019). Change and variability of phenomena in complex social systems. Wisdom, 13(2), 95-103. https://doi:10.24234/WISDOM.V13I2.276
Popova Z. D., & Sternin I. A. (2006). Semantic and cognitive analysis of language. Voronezh, 250 p.
Saenko, N., Voronkova, O., Zatsarinnaya, E., & Mikhailova, M. (2020). Philosophical and cultural foundations of the concept of “nihitogenesis”. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 11(1), 88-103.
Shulyatikov I. S. (2015). The term "concept" in modern linguistics. Bulletin of the Vyatka State University for the Humanities. 12, 98 - 102.
Shmalko, Y., & Rudakova, O. (2021). Language Barrier as a Result of Rummination in the Contaxt of Distance Learning. Russian Journal of Education and Psychology, 12(3), 74-85. https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-4034-2021-12-3-74-85
Simmons W. K., & Barsalou L. W. (2003). The similarity-in-topography principle: Reconciling theories of conceptual defi cits. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 451-486.
Telia, V. N. (1996). Russian phraseology. Semantic, pragmatic and linguoculturological aspects. M., 288 p.
Tulving, E., & Patterson, R. D. (1968). Functional units and retrieval processes in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 239-248.
Vorotnikov, Yu. L. (2001). The linguistic picture of the world as a linguistic category. International Scientific Conference "Language and Culture", Moscow, 191-196
Warrington, E. K. (1971). Neurological disorders of memory. British Medical Bulletin, 27, 243-247.
Werning, M., Hinzen, W., & Machery, E. (2011). The Oxford handbook of compositionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 147 p.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Revista de Investigaciones Universidad del Quindío
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
