Ecotópicas narrativas en inglés discurso bíblico: Un estudio del antiguo y nuevo testamento
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33975/riuq.vol34n1.725Palabras clave:
discurso bíblico, componente ecológico, conceptos bíblicos que forman el discurso, ecodescriptor, narración, ecotópico narrativoResumen
Objetivo: Este artículo aborda el Antiguo y el Nuevo Testamento vistos desde la perspectiva narrativa ecológica en contextos ambientales y sociales.
Método: El método aplicado combina las técnicas de análisis conceptual, semántico, temático y narrativo en la interpretación original de los autores.
Resultados y discussion: Examina las narraciones bíblicas a través de cuatro conceptos que forman el discurso: DIOS, NATURALEZA, HOMBRE y SOCIEDAD, varias combinaciones de los cuales dan forma a un conjunto de ecotópicos narrativos centrados en el concepto de HOMBRE. Ecotópicos como "El hombre y la naturaleza en su interacción", "El hombre y las relaciones familiares", "El hombre en la sociedad", "El camino del hombre hacia Dios" revelan las relaciones entre el hombre, la naturaleza, Dios, la familia y la sociedad, así como la responsabilidad del hombre. ante Dios. Su componente ecológico está marcado por ecodescriptores verbocéntricos actualizados en esquemas narrativos. Material. Este estudio se centra en la narrativa ecotópica "El camino del hombre hacia Dios" con su subtema "El camino a través del sacrificio", presentado en las historias de Abraham en Génesis y Ana en 1 Samuel del Antiguo Testamento en comparación con la historia de Jesús en 1 Pedro, 1 Juan y el Evangelio de Juan del Nuevo Testamento.
Conclusiones: En el Antiguo Testamento, el camino hacia Dios a través del sacrificio en narraciones cargadas de ecología refleja la disposición del hombre a sacrificar su cosa más valiosa para demostrar su fidelidad y fe. En el Nuevo Testamento, el sacrificio de Jesús involucra a toda la humanidad, gracias a sus sufrimientos por su vida sin pecado.
Descargas
Citas
Alefirenko, N. F. (2010). Concept – notion – category in the light of modern linguocognitive science. Nauchnyye vedomosti, v. 7, 18(89): 5–12.
Alifanova, O. G. (2010). Cognitive and discursive potential of a narrative (the narrative of the Holy Scriptures). PhD dissertation, Irkutsk State University, Irkutsk.
Alter, R. (2011/1980). The Art of biblical narrative. New York: Basic Books.
Babyre, O. V. (2011). Stylistic devices as argumentative techniques in English ecological discourse (documentary films). Linhvistyka ХХІ stolittia: novi doslidzhennia i perspektyvy: 51–56.
Bauckham, R. (2010). The Bible and ecology: Rediscovering the community of creation. Waco, Texas: Baylor University Press.
Berlin, A. (1994). Poetics and interpretation of biblical narrative. Winona Lake, Indiana: EISENBRAUNS.
Bernstein, E. (2005). The splendor of creation: А biblical ecology. Cleveland, Ohio: The Pilgrim Press.
Boldyrev, N. N. (2016). Functional categorization of the English verb. Moscow / Berlin: Direkt-Media.
Boldyrev, N. N., Alpatov, V. V. (2008). A cognitive-matrix analysis of English christian place-names. Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki, v. 4: 5–14.
Bolotnova, N.S. (2009). Philological analysis of the text. Moscow: Izd-vo Flinta; Izd-vo Nauka.
Bondarenko, E. V. (2014). Matrix Modeling. The duality of time in the English-language picture of the world. Kharkov: KhNU imeni V.N. Karazina.
Bredin, M. (2010). The ecology of the New Testament: Creation, re-creation, and the environment. Colorado Springs, CO: Biblica Publishing.
Cambridge English Online Dictionary. Available from: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/ru/
Cooper, A. M. (1976). Biblical poetics: A linguistic approach. PhD dissertation, Yale University, Connecticut.
Funk, R. W. (1988). The poetics оf biblical narrative. Sonoma: Polebridge Press.
Ionova, S. V. (2011). On ecologicity signs of textual communication. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, v. 2, 1(13): 190–197.
Іzotova, N. P. (2009). Textual concept WAY TO GLORY in English biographical novels of the XX century: semantic-cognitive and narrative aspects. PhD dissertation, Kyiv National Linguistic University, Kyiv.
Jindo, J. Y. (2009). Toward a poetics of the biblical mind: Language, culture, and cognition. Vetus Testamentum, 59(2): 222–243. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/953460/Toward_a_Poetics_of_the_Biblical_Mind_Language_Culture_and_Cognition
Khribar, S. F. (2003). Ecology in the Bible. Forms of religious and ecological worldview. Kyiv: Kiyevskiy ekologo-kulturnyy tsentr. Available from: http://www.ecoethics.ru/old/b46/
Kolesnyk, O. S. (2013). Linguo-cultural dimension of mythological semiosis. Visnyk Luhanskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka, Ch. 1, 9(268): 239–246,.
Kostyushkina, G. M. (2005). Modern trends in French linguistics. Irkutsk: Izd-vo BGUEP.
Kravchenko, N. K. (2018). Ecopragmatics as a new field of research in modern linguistics. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu, v. 1, 34: 98–101.
Kravchenko, N., Pasternak, T., Davydova, T. (2020). Eco-pragmatics: the state of the art. Cogito, v. XII, 3: 281–296.
Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leshchenko, A. V. (2017). Narrative tension of a literary text. Cherkassy: ChP Gordiyenko.
Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. (2009). Longman: Pearson Education.
Louder, D. K. (2005). Marks’s poem of the passion (15: 16–26): А study in poetics and biblical interpretation. PhD dissertation, Princeton Theological Seminary, Princeton.
McKinion, R. L. (2006). An analysis of a compositional approach to biblical narrative (Genesis 37). PhD dissertation, Southeasten Baptist Theological Seminary, Wake Forest.
Nazarov, K. V. (2015). The problem of focalization of the Old Testament narrative. Narratorium, 1(8). Available from: http://narratorium.rggu.ru/article.html?id=2634325
Nikonova, V.G. (2008). The conceptual space of the tragic in Shakespeare’s plays: poetic-cognitive analysis. DrSc dissertation, Kyiv National Linguistic University, Kyiv.
Orekhova, N. N., Shitikov, P. M. (2013). Conceptual metaphors in the Gospel of John. Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki, 2(035): 122–125.
Pankov, G. D. (2010). Christian anthropology of sacrifice: The evangelical ideal and modern realities. Znamenskiye chteniya. Available from: http://studydoc.ru/doc/2161798/pankov-g.d.--hristianskaya-antropologiya
Propp, V. (1968). Morphology of the folktale. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Rudelev, V. G. (2012). The problems of ecology in modern Russian language. Tasks and difficulties of their decision. Ecology of language and speech: 15–18.
Rudenko, N. (2010). Ecological linguistic concepts in poetic discourse: translation aspect. Naukovyi Visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu, v. Х: 65–68.
Shakhovskiy, V. I., Solodovnikova, N. G. (2013). Greening modern science and parameters of ecological communication. In: Shakhovskiy, V.I. (Ed.). Emotive linguoecology in the modern communicative space. Volgograd: Izd-vo VSGPU “Peremena”.
Shamne, N. L., Karyanin, A. V. (2011). Verbal aggression as the violation of ecologicity in the political discourse. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 1(13): 204–208.
Sternberg, M. (1988). The poetics of biblical narrative. Ideological literature and the drama of reading. Bloomingston, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
The Holy Bible. King James Version. (1991). New York: Ivy Books.
Usborne Illustrated Dictionary and Thesaurus. (2007). London: Usborne Publishing Ltd.
Vorobyоva, O. P. (1993). Text categories and factor of addressee. Kiev: Vishcha shkola.
Weiss, A. L. (2006). Figurative language in biblical prose narrative: Metaphor in the Book of Samuel. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Wright, C. J. H. (1983). An eye for an eye: Тhe place of Old Testament ethics today. Downers Grove, Ill: InterVarsity Press.
Zebre, G. (1992). Ecology according to the New Testament. Direction, 21(2). Available from: http://www.directionjournal.org/21/2/ecology-according-to-new-testament.html
Zhabotinskaya, S. A. (2009). Concept / Domain: Matrix and network models. Kultura narodov Prichernomoria, v. 1, 168: 254–259.
Zhykharieva, O. O. (2018). Conceptual ecotopics in English biblical ecodiscourse. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho linhvistychnoho universytetu, v. 21(1): 112–120.
Zolotova, G. A. (1982). Communicative aspects of Russian syntax.Moscow: Izd-vo Nauka.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Revista de Investigaciones Universidad del Quindío
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
